spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB
Meet The Robinsons Does Well - 3-D E-mail
Monday, 02 April 2007

The Walt Disney Co.'s animated movie Meet the Robinsons raked in $7.1 million over the weekend in theaters screening a new three- dimensional version industry watchers are tracking closely.  Disney said the 3-D "Robinsons" played in 581 theaters equipped with digital projectors and it out-grossed the traditional, two-dimensional version by 2.6 times per theater.  The $7.1 million gives the 3-D film a $12,220 per theater average, which is a strong showing given the weekend's No. 1 film, "Blades of Glory," averaged $9,790 per location in more than 3,300 theaters.

Source: Reuters 

Including both 3-D and 2-D versions, "Meet the Robinsons," which tells of the futuristic adventures of a young boy, took in $25 million in about 3,400 theaters and had a per screen average of around $7,300 to place No. 2 at box offices.

Hollywood and theater owners are closely following ticket sales of 3-D movies because many of them believe cutting-edge digital projectors now being installed in theaters could boost box office by offering alternatives to traditional 2-D movies.

Disney is a major proponent of 3-D films having released computer animated "Chicken Little" in a 3-D version in 2005 that raked in $26,000 per theater in around 80 venues. The 2-D version averaged nearly $11,000 a theater in 3,600 locations.

Last summer, Sony Corp .'s Columbia Pictures released a 3-D version of computer animated "Monster House" in 162 digitally-equipped theaters and averaged around $15,000 per venue, which was more than 2.5 times the 2-D version.

Other types of alternative content include music concerts and sports games held live in one location and broadcast via satellite to movie theaters around the world.

Comments (3)add feed
... : Kyle
Robinsons was great, I hope everyone is going to see it. The 3D really did enhance the experience, but the touching character moments made the film. The TV trailers don't do it justice, in fact I think the awful trailers are keeping some people away. Don't listen to them ;)
April 3, 2007
hmmm : vm
I think the movie started really bad, story wise and character wise. and only got slightly more interesting towards the end. it looks really patchy, and I'm very disappointed in the animation. to think I couldn't wait to see it... mostly because of the cool rigs.

the film looks nice, but acting wise is very cheap and stupid (maybe kids like it, I don't know), and I'm kind of tired of this smooth, bouncy animation, replacing acting. like cartoon takes replace acting. same problem. they've tried to do old style wacky deformations and round movement, but the result has almost no impact, and it's not backed up by content - which is another way to say that if the acting is cheap, crazy whirlpooly animation doesn't save the day.

I have the feeling that because deformations evolved so much in 3D in the last couple years, and because we can do supertoon rigs and animation nowadays, in 3D... this sort of becomes such a big deal... that some people forget it's just a graphical detail, it's not the main thing. it's not acting and it's not story. I'm 1000% more entertained by South Park. That stuff really works all in all, even if it looks...
April 11, 2007
My opinion about post... : Grigorr
Ahoj, fayna stranka v tebe :)
_____
http://laminate.msl-ltd.com http://water.msl-ltd.com/
May 2, 2007
Write comment
Name
Email
Title
Comment
Write the displayed characters


 
spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB



This website is optimized for Firefox!


(C) 1996-2006 Toonstruck, LLC
CGCHAR is maintained by Rick May
spacer.png, 0 kB