spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB
 
DreamWorks Announces 3-D Move E-mail
Tuesday, 13 March 2007

DWA logoDreamWorks Animation announced today its intention to produce all of its films in stereoscopic 3D technology starting in 2009.  To best take advantage of the technology, the company will now be creating films utilizing stereoscopic 3D from the beginning of its creative process.

“I believe that this is the greatest opportunity for movies and for the theatrical exhibition business that has come along in 30 years,” said Jeffrey Katzenberg, Chief Executive Officer of DreamWorks Animation. “Advancements in sound have dramatically improved the auditory experience, but there hasn’t been a corresponding breakthrough in the way we see movies until now.   Stereoscopic 3D technology gives us a real opportunity to significantly enhance the theater experience.”

To date, most films shown in 3D have been created for traditional projection and then rendered into 3D in post-production. In order to take full advantage of the new technology, DreamWorks intends to make films with the stereoscopic 3D concept in mind from the beginning of the production process. The company believes that this approach will increase its storytelling opportunities and create a more immersive movie-viewing experience.

“Historically, 3D has been used primarily as an add-on or a bonus feature,” Katzenberg said.   “And while audiences have enjoyed that, they haven’t really seen the true potential of this technology.  We’re going to use the latest stereoscopic 3D technology to build our movies from the ground up.  We believe that this will create more opportunities for our artists as well as more compelling experience for the audience.”

The growth in the number of theaters capable of projecting 3D films has dramatically risen in the past two years.  It is expected by 2009 that there will be several thousand screens equipped for 3D. DreamWorks Animation believes that the rapid deployment of digital cinemas by exhibitors around the world and the latest technology developments will allow the company to take advantage of this new platform. The company has started production on its first film in this format, Monsters vs. Aliens (working title), intended for release in the summer of  2009.

“I believe CG animation is in the best position to take advantage of the latest advancement in 3D technology,” said Katzenberg.  “Since our films are made digitally, it presents numerous opportunities for our filmmakers. And by moving into this area now, DreamWorks Animation is developing expertise that will differentiate our films and provide a lasting competitive advantage.”

The exhibition industry sees a major opportunity from this new format.

“Theater owners are excited by this technology because it not only provides a more special movie-going experience but also a meaningful growth opportunity as research suggests more people come to see 3D movies, and ticket pricing has more flexibility,” said Jim Tharp, President of Distribution for Paramount Pictures, distributor of DreamWorks movies. “The advancements in home entertainment products, especially flat-screen TVs, have made it more important than ever that exhibitors offer a unique and special theatrical experience, 3D does that in a big way and film goers have already seen that this can be a premium experience.”

DreamWorks is assembling a world-class team to drive its stereoscopic 3D vision.

Jason Clark, who most recently was Executive Producer on Monster House 3D and Jim Mainard, who for many years was the head of DreamWorks Animation's Research and Development, will both be leading the launch of DreamWorks Animation’s stereoscopic 3D efforts.

  
Phil McNally, Stereographer on Chicken Little & Stereographic Supervisor on Meet the Robinsons, will be the Stereographic Supervisor on DreamWorks Animation’s first stereoscopic 3D movie, Monsters vs. Aliens.

“I’m thrilled to welcome Phil and Jason to the DreamWorks team,” Katzenberg said.  “Along with Jim, we will have tremendous leadership for this initiative.  By combining their talents and expertise with our resources and commitment, I believe we will be able to tell better stories and create a totally new and special experience for movie goers.”

Comments (9)add feed
... : anonymous
Once again, Katzenburg misses the point. It's not about the technology, it's about the story.
March 13, 2007
remind me of somthing :) : galigula
http://www.bigmoviezone.com/articles/index.html?uniq=240

anyway, i can t wait to see your next movie :)
keep the good work going
March 14, 2007
... : Josh
Meeh...let them. They'll either go bankrupt from releasing polished turd or they'll finally get a clue and we'll get a good American animated film from someone other than Pixar.
Until then I'll just keep watching animation from the only place that seems to have a clue, i.e. Japan.
March 14, 2007
... : Josh
Oh and is it just me or is sterioscopic 3D in cinemas flickery as all hell when there is fast motion on screen?
I'm going to see Meet the Robinsons on a normal projector because 3D chicken little and Monster House bugged the hell out of me.
March 14, 2007
Japan : David
Films that are popular in Japan wont ever do big money in the US. The audiences here are just not built for it.
March 14, 2007
Not so fast! : CG maniac
The reason movies (i.e. International movies, even blockbusters) don't do "very well" in the US is because of "INSIDE RESTRICTIONS" --- that is, they don't get 1) same level of 'promotion', 2) are restricted in # of theatres shown, and 3) receive 'bad publicity' (mmmm? by whom???).

And lastly, not related, but because American viewers are not as 'sophisticated' (i.e. lack of Foreign exposure besides STEREOTYPES and CLICHES) due to their limited exposure to anything 'non-american'.

Japan : David
Films that are popular in Japan wont ever do big money in the US. The audiences here are just not built for it.
March 14, 2007
March 18, 2007
.. : Ron
Well, one could argue that the movies don't get the same promotion and number of theaters is because the risk is not worth the reward. If you promote a film with $50 million in advertising, that doesn't mean that it will automatically pay for itself.

Tastes in films are different for various countries. To say that American viewers aren't sophisticated is pretty short sighted and unrealistic. They just have a different taste than some other countries.
March 18, 2007
read again : Read carefully
PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:

And lastly, not related, but because American viewers are not as 'sophisticated' (i.e. lack of Foreign exposure besides STEREOTYPES and CLICHES) due to their limited exposure to anything 'non-american'.

SURE EVERYONE HAS DIFFERENT "TASTES" -- but this is not what the poster is talking about. He/she is referring to "exposure" for foreign content/cultures.
March 19, 2007
DavidB : DBizzle
You are all idiots.
August 7, 2007
Write comment
Name
Email
Title
Comment
Write the displayed characters


 
spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB



This website is optimized for Firefox!


(C) 1996-2006 Toonstruck, LLC
CGCHAR is maintained by Rick May
spacer.png, 0 kB