spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB
 
Pixar Story Process E-mail
Thursday, 14 December 2006

If you eavesdropped on a Pixar Animation story session, you'd hear discussions of what director John Lasseter calls "The Rules."  In no small way, adherence to Pixar's storytelling "rules" accounts for the studio's perfect string of hits -- from 1995's "Toy Story" to 2006's "Cars" -- and suggests things to come from Disney Animation, now that Lasseter serves as the studio's creative chief. 

"To make these films work, you have to do three things," Lasseter asserts:

"Tell a compelling story with humor and heart that keeps people wondering what will happen next.

"Secondly, populate it with memorable characters. If audiences invest in your main character, they'll travel that character's journey. Even the bad guys have to be likable, because you're asking audiences to spend the equivalent of a nice long lunch with them.

"Finally, put the story and characters into a believable world."

 

 The rest of this Variety article can be read here .

Comments (3)add feed
... : Josh
Obviously it's a matter of opinion but I don't think "Cars" did any of those things well, it had a very predictable story but the heart and humour were there, only had one memorable character (Mater), the main character was obnoxious and Owen's voice grated on my nerves and by the end i didn't care about him at all.
December 15, 2006
Animator : Andrew B.
The show was weak Pixar is on a Burnout Run...Clever pun!
December 30, 2006
... : FloydBishop
The problem I had with "Cars" was that there were just WAY too many characters. With so many main and supporting charatcers, yuo don't have enough time to explore and build up the characters as much, and you end up with lame stereotyped characters (such as Filmore and Sarge). Had they cut the cast down a bit, they could have explored the main characters further, and gotten into the history of the town and the falling in love of Lightning and Sally. Instead, both of these were left up to music montages.

While these montages did serve their purposes to an extent, they could have been great cappers to a build up rather than stand alones.

The worst thing "Cars" had going for it was that it was the follow up to "The Incredibles", whose story and characters were rock solid. As a whole, it wasn't a bad film, but it wasn't their strongest.

As far as character development and story, I'd rank the Pixar films as follows:

1 The Incredibles

2 Toy Story

3 Monsters, Inc

4 Toy Story 2

5 A Bug's Life

6 Cars
December 31, 2006
Write comment
Name
Email
Title
Comment
Write the displayed characters


 
spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB



This website is optimized for Firefox!


(C) 1996-2006 Toonstruck, LLC
CGCHAR is maintained by Rick May
spacer.png, 0 kB